Objectives/Hypothesis
To review hearing results and complications for the NiTiBOND next generation shape memory prosthesis and compare them with results for the current shape memory prosthesis (SMart).
Study Design
Retrospective, multicenter chart review.
Methods
Primary laser stapedotomy was performed using either a NiTiBOND or a SMart prosthesis. Ninety-two ears in 79 patients were included in the study (67.4% female), 52 with the NiTiBOND prosthesis and 40 with the SMart prosthesis. Data collected included demographic variables, pre- and postoperative pure-tone air and bone conduction thresholds, speech discrimination scores, complications, and the need for revision surgery. Pure-tone average (PTA) and PTA air-bone gap (ABG) pre- and postoperative were computed. Success was defined as a postoperative ABG of ≤10 dB.
Results
There were no significant differences between groups in hearing results, including improvement in ABG, change in speech discrimination, change in air or bone PTA, or change in high-frequency bone PTA. Short-term (mean = 4.4 and 4.9 weeks, respectively) success rates for the NiTiBOND and SMart prostheses were 84.6% and 70.0%, respectively, with this difference closing at the most recent test (83.7% and 80.0%, respectively). No revision surgery took place in either group, and there were no differences in complications such as dizziness, tinnitus, or taste disturbance, though the NiTiBOND group tended to have a lower rate of transient or permanent vertigo.
Conclusions
Compared with the SMart prosthesis, the NiTiBOND prosthesis is a safe prosthesis that achieves at least comparable hearing results and may offer some surgical advantages.
Level of Evidence
4 Laryngoscope, 2016
from #ORL via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1UNdiLW
via IFTTT
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου